=====
From roth@ens.ascom.ch:
Couldn't see a single thing
=====
From jknepley@nyx.net:
The scene is so dimly lit as to be difficult to see.


=====
From djconnel@flash.net:

The red background is a nice touch.  The  models are well done.
However, the lighting is much too dark and the scene texturing a bit
too simple.  BTW there should be more electrodes on the chair.

I don't find this image at all pleasing, but I suppose that's the point.


=====
From castlewrks@aol.com:
Image is too dark to give a proper judgement to.  
=====
From up@ct.heise.de:
more light would have been good.

=====
From agage@mines.edu:
More light -- some of the objects are almost invisible.

=====
From bbowen@cswnet.com:
Is this a joke about lightbulbs? I can't see anything. Sorry.
batronyx@conwaycorp.net

=====
From sonya_roberts@geocities.com:
Eeewwww...yes, we always like to forget about the "other" things engineering has
been used to create...great concept.  Image is rather dark though, I had to
grab a copy and take it into PSP and gamma-correct before I could see what it
was.

=====
From beliaev@utu.fi:
Your image is too dark, it's almost black on my monitor.

=====
From tlyons@gnn.com:

is there an image there?? all I see is a black screen 8-(
=====
From daves@wkpowerlink.com:
Too black. A dim spotlight might have worked better.
=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Quite a morbid scene.  Almost too dark to view.  But I suppose these are
"great" achievements in their own right.

=====
From bill@apocalypse.org:
So dark (both emotionally and light-wise)

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Are any technologies displayed here at all?
What's great about this?  How is engineering involved?
Scene (and concept) is much, much too dark for me.


=====
From karl@pemail.net:
Far too dark. I couldn't see the image at all until I pushed the
brightness/contrast way up

=====
From bobfranke@halcyon.com:
I'm not sure what to say.  On my monitor this looks like a night scene of a
black cat.  I increased the brightness and contract 80% and surprise,  there is
an image in there.  I really like the lighting but the subject matter seems a
bit off topic.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Different!

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
The darkest raytrace ever seen... I must see it latter at my home PC, with a
better monitor: this one at work really sucks... (the monitor, not your
image!).

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
So this is your idea of _great_ engineering _achievements_?? I'd rather do
without those.

=====
From lpurple@netcom.com:
The image required heavy gamma correction before I could see it at all.
Othre than that, not bad (if somewhat heavy-handed in its message).


=====
From r@cust169.webbernet.net>:
Very, very dark.  Many viewers may have gamma problems.  But you don't really
want to see the horrible, evil subject matter more clearly.  Well modelled. 
Hideously effective.


=====
From r@ts6-14.hfx.istar.ca:
I still can't figure out what it's supposed to be :(